|
|
|
|
|
GOLDSEA |
ASIAMS.NET |
ASIAN AMERICAN ISSUES
Michael Chang: Time to Retire from Tennis?
hirteen years ago Michael Chang was lionized as the youngest man ever to win the French Open and the first American male to win in 36 years. This year he quietly exited Roland Garros after blowing a two-set-to-love lead in a first-round match with an obscure Frenchman ranked 224th.
Played Out?
|
Chang himself has ceased being a marquee name except in cities like Hong Kong, Beijing and Taipei. His ATP ranking has slipped to 116th from 73rd at the end of 2001. For the first five months of 2002 his prize money totaled a paltry $53,835 compared with $483,000 in 2000, $1.2 million in 1997 and a high of $2 million in 1995. Michael Chang now spends half his time competing in Challenger series tournaments offering piddling purses. His most recent win was $7,200 at an April tournament in Calabasas -- and that was one of his biggest wins of the year. Another Challenger event in Tarzana a week later netted him $520.
Not that Chang needs the prize money to keep himself in tennis balls. His winnings since turning pro at the age of 15 total $18.9 million. And that's not counting an estimated $50 million in endorsements.
It isn't money that keeps Michael Chang playing tennis. It is God. Or rather, the deep conviction that he has been blessed with his once-unparalleled quickness and killer groundstrokes so that they can be applied to the service of Jesus. A world-class Jesus freak, Michael Chang is animated by the missionary zeal of spreading the gospel to tennis fans worldwide.
"I used to put too much emphasis on winning and losing, but my perspective changed when I became a Christian," he once told a fan. "It is much easier now to go out and perform because I no longer feel that same pressure -- God has taken it away. He has given me a great sense of peace. I've also been very blessed in my life because I have my mom, dad, sister-in-law Diana, and brother Carl (my coach) supporting and praying for me."
God has not seen fit to grant Chang the level of tennis greatness attained by contemporaries Pete Sampras (six months older) and Andre Agassi (22 months older). Michael Chang has won 34 career titles but his only Grand Slam title came when he won the 1989 French Open at the sensational age of 17 years and 3 months. By contrast his lifelong tennis nemesis Pete Sampras owns 63 titles, 13 of which are Grand Slams. Andre Agassi counts 7 Grand Slams among his 52 singles titles.
God might also be resented for denying Michael Chang, 30, the longevity granted to erswhile rivals. Like Chang, Sampras was knocked out of the 2002 French Open in the first round but has played well enough in recent months to hold number 23 in ATP rankings. Agassi, now 32, is enjoying a remarkable comeback after a long, humiliating slump, winning the 1999 French and U.S. Opens and the 2000 and 2001 Australian Open, in addition to reaching the Wimbledon finals or semis three years running.
That's the kind of resurgence boldly predicted in 2000 for Michael by his father Joe Chang, the man who was Michael's first coach. The son failed the father's prophecy. He has not reached even a Grand Slam semi since losing to Patrick Rafter in straight sets at the 97 U.S. Open. The closest Chang came to a second Grand Slam title was losing the 96 U.S. Open final to Sampras, and losing the 1995 French Open final to Thomas Muster -- both in straight sets.
In fairness let's recall the golden years when Michael Chang exceeded every expectation placed on his young head.
He was born on February 22, 1972 in Hoboken, New Jersey. It was his brother Carl, three years his elder, who had been earmarked for tennis glory by papa Joe, a research chemist. But by age eight the tagalong kid brother had shown enough promise to be entered in local tournaments. As an eighth grader at Oak Crest Junior High, the 12-year-old Chang took a high school algebra course just so he could qualify for the San Diego high school championships. He won it by beating Carl in the finals. Hailed a prodigy of the SoCal junior circuit, Chang came up time and again against another prodigy from Rancho Palos Verdes named Pete Sampras -- and got the better of him, more times than not.
Michael had just begun his sophomore year at Valencia High when he made his mark on the international tennis scene. By beating Australian star Paul McNamee in the opening round of the 1987 U.S. Open, he became the youngest man ever to win a match there. It was a remarkable feat. A sport full of tall power players had been set on its ear by a 5-9 boy weighing 139! Four months later Michael, not yet 16, dropped out of high school and his mother Betty dropped out of her career as a biochemist. The decision had been made to turn Michael's tennis career into a family business.
"Money was the biggest problem," Michael explained. For the two years preceding the decision to turn pro, his parents had depleted their savings at the tune of $40,000-50,000 a year on tournament traveling expenses and lessons from the likes of Australian Phil Dent and Argentinian Jose Higuera. "We're middle class people. It was getting out of hand." If Michael wanted to continue rising in the tennis world, turning pro was the only option.
Thus was born what the tennis press snidely dubbed "The Chang Gang". Joe was head coach and CEO. Betty was chauffeur, cheerleader and constant companion. Carl, a freshman at Cal and already an ace on its tennis squad, was recruited to serve as his kid brother's hitting partner, assistant coach, and ultimately, coach. At various times Joe Chang retained top pros to polish aspects of Michael's game, but caught flack for being his son's only real coach until giving up the job to Carl.
But who can question the Chang Gang's success? Between 1989 and 1997, the family business averaged well over a million a year in prize money, not to mention upwards of $8 million a year in endorsements. But by 1998 Michael Chang's career hit a ravine. His winnings totaled under a half million and he failed to get past the early rounds of any Grand Slam event. His only titles were minor events in Boston and Shanghai. The next year he failed to win even a minor. In 2000 he sparked a brief comeback hope by winning the Los Angeles open, but by year end he was written off as a has been.
His outings since haven't changed that perception, least of all his most recent ones. His 160-pound frame looks more powerful, perhaps, than in his salad days, but it also seems sluggish, tired.
Michael Chang's phenomenal success in attracting endorsements over the years has depended on his role as the tennis world's Asian standard-bearer. No one is appearing on the horizon to take over that role. Yet, many AA tennis fans find it even sadder to see their old hero repeatedly humiliated in early rounds of minor events.
Has the time come for Michael Chang to bow out of professional tennis? Or is there a realistic prospect of an Agassi-style comeback?
This interactive article is closed to new input.
Discussions posted during the past year remain available for browsing.
CONTACT US
|
ADVERTISING INFO
© 1996-2013 Asian Media Group Inc
No part of the contents of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission.
|
|
|
|
WHAT YOU SAY
[This page is closed to new input. --Ed.]
(Updated
Tuesday, Apr 1, 2008, 06:09:43 PM)
Trust me when I say that Michael has done enough already and there's nothing left for him to prove to anyone, even to himself, given his God-given ability/natural talent/physique/etc. He's already an American legend/icon IMO, especially among AAs.
The foursome, the generation of Chang, Sampras, Agassi and Courier, will go down in US tennis history as the greatest ever/torch bearers bar none.
Realistically-speaking/tennis-wise, Michael has nothing to play for; he's not gonna be a top 5 player again/he's not gonna win another grand slam/he's not gonna win another top-tier(i.e., Masters series) tournaments. Who really cares if Michael somehow manages to win a Shanghai or a President's cup from half way around the globe?!
I hope and pray that I'll be proven wrong, and miracles do happen but, in Michael's case I think it happened 13 yrs ago at the Roland Garros...After '89 French Open triumph, surely, Michael could have won a few more grand slams. It still baffles me. Michael should have won a total of 3 or 4 grand slams if everything went well.
But, boy, whenever he came oh-so-close, he just ran into a bigger, taller, more powerful/athletic opponent each time, e.g., Australian Open(against Becker), French Open(Muster), and a couple of -- if not several -- heart-breaking losses to the eventual champions at the Flushing Meadows...
I've been playing tennis well over 20 yrs now -- I still play tennis twice a wk at my club -- and when I strike up a conversation with my opponent of the wk, sometimes inevitably Michael's name do get brought up. And always people do make very nice comments regarding Chang's career and impacts he's had.
15- 20 yrs ago, hey, there was absolutely no tennis player of Asian descent that we cold talk about. (Of course, I tend to take their comments with a grain of salt seeing how Michael's been struggling the past few yrs, but the comments did seem genuine/heart-felt at the time).
I can't watch Michael's match any more because I'm afraid of what might happen, you know. There were several instances in the past where I almost threw my TV set out the window. Normally I'm very calm and cool-headed...
I have to stop here. My back hurts now after serving those 130 mph serves...Haha...
One Korean Man
Tuesday, September 10, 2002 at 22:10:38 (PDT)
[205.188.209.109]
Stick a fork in it, he's done !!!
when it's over it's over
Tuesday, September 10, 2002 at 14:16:25 (PDT)
[153.104.214.108]
Well I really don't think that Michael should give it up just yet. He's getting old and he's being overpowered by the newer generations where brute force overtakes finess. His topspin moves are outclassed now. But hey if there's something we all have to learn is this: never give up, keep your head up high and keep going. I've always been a Michael fan and I just hope that just one day he'll win a grand slam and retire. Retiring without a win just looks bad. I don't want our Asian American Star to step down and look bad. At least something close to a Grand Slam. He can do it I'm sure but he has to give it everything he's got. Just one more year and it's all over with style.
Astralius
Monday, September 09, 2002 at 13:45:29 (PDT)
NEWEST COMMENTS |
EARLIER COMMENTS
|