Asian Air 
Imagemap

GOLDSEA | ASIAMS.NET | ASIAN AMERICAN ISSUES


KOREA OR COREA?
(Updated Tuesday, Apr 1, 2008, 06:07:01 PM.)

e at GoldSea choose to honor the more natural rendering commonly used in the English-speaking world prior to the Japanese annexation and colonialization of Corea beginning in 1905.
     American and English books published during the latter half of the 19th century generally referred to the nation as "Corea" as recently as the years immediately preceding Japan's formal annexation of Corea in 1910. An 1851 map of East Asia by Englishman John Tallis labels the nation Corea. The same spelling is used in The Mongols, a 1908 history of the Mongol race by Jeremiah Curtin, the world's foremost Asia scholar of the day, as well as in several books by American missionaries published between 1887 and 1905.
     Japan's annexation of Corea didn't become formal until 1910, but for all practical purposes Japan had become the power that regulated Corea's relations with the outside world in 1897 when it defeated China in a war over Japan's ambition to exercise control over Corea. The only other power willing to contest Japan's supremacy in the Corean peninsula was Russia. When it was easily defeated by Japan at Port Arthur in 1905, the annexation of Corea became a fait accompli. Anxious to avoid a costly Pacific conflict, President Wilson ignored the pleas of a delegation of Corean patriots and their American missionary supporters and turned a blind eye to Japan's acts of formal annexation and colonization of Corea. During that period Japan mounted a campaign to push for the "Korea" useage by the American press. Why? For one of Japan's prospective colonies to precede its master in the alphabetical lineup of nations would be unseemly, Japanese imperialists decided.
     Japan's colonial rule over Corea ended on August 15, 1945 when it lost World War II. Now that Corea is eagerly shedding the last vestiges of the colonial period, even demolishing public buildings erected by the Japanese (for example, the monstrously immense colonial governor's mansion), forward-thinking Corean and Corean American journalists, intellectuals and scholars are urging the American media to revert to the original, more natural rendering of Corea.
    The changeover will pose a problem only in English-speaking nations as other western nations never accepted the "K" spelling. For example, France, Spain, Italy, Brazil, Argentina and Mexico, among many others, use the "C" rendering.
     English convention, too, is on the side of the Corea rendering. Non-European names are romanized with a "C" (Cambodia, Canada, cocoa, Comanche, Congo, and even old Canton, for example) except where the first letter is followed by an "e" or an "i", (as in Kenya). Other than that, the "K" spelling is used only in connoting childlike ignorance of spelling conventions ("Kitty Kat" and "Skool", for examples).
     Therefore, the American "K" spelling is

  1. offensive from a historical standpoint (remember "Peking" and "Canton"?);
  2. violates western rendering conventions;
  3. suggests a lack of sophistication toward Corea; and
  4. by connoting naiveté, imputes a lack of sophistication to Corea and its people.

     The Corea rendering will ultimately become universal when more Americans are educated as to the offensive and relatively recent origin of the "Korea" rendering. The English-speaking world was responsible for agreeing to Japanese efforts to change the spelling of Corea's name in English useage. Who better than concerned Asian Americans to help change it back?

This interactive article is closed to new input.
Discussions posted during the past year remain available for browsing.

Asian American Videos


Films & Movies Channel


Humor Channel


Identity Channel


Vocals & Music Channel


Makeup & Hair Channel


Intercultural Channel


CONTACT US | ADVERTISING INFO

© 1996-2013 Asian Media Group Inc
No part of the contents of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission.

WHAT YOU SAY

[This page is closed to new input. --Ed.]
It's funny how many nationalists are extraordinarily sensitive with fragile egos and a great capacity to distort reality...Chinese, Corean, American. Love of one's own and some forms of patriotism are often noble, beautiful, and necessary things. But nationalism, all consuming nationalism is ugly and a form of weakness as is ethnic pride mongering...though it's a helluva lot more dangerous in those who have the power...hopefully China will do better than the West though I doubt it. We all need to take a course in neo-colonialism...you lose your colonies but keep power over the images, words, discussion...so we're left here with a debate we can't win.

As for rude Corean men who beat their wives...it's funny how as an Asian-American I'm told I'm too quiet and need to speak my mind and am a wimp towards women--now I'm told I'm rude and beat my women...What is this? Basically...well, I don't know if it ultimately comes from Christianity forming the basic psychology of modern man but I've seen this especially in white men. You see something different, encounter something very different. You are not very wise or perceptive. You have a great need to have ego-sustaining images of the other--whether animal, dumb black people or sinister, conniving asian people--the foreigner takes on negative images which contrast with the positive images--an aryan ideal, the progressive, white, pinnacle of modern human rights--embodied often by Sweden or Europe generally...and you perpetuate this through your grip on the media, what people see and read and hear. This is not some plot or conscious even but a need to feed something ugly within the soul...not limited to whites but they've had the power to do what they want for much of recent history. Certainly it seems real to many, there is some grain of truth in these often amorphous, simlistic images or stereotypes and reality is not so real. So any confirmation of this stereotype simply strengthens it and we often ignore what does not comply with our mental imagery. So there are rude and boisterous people in Korea as there are submissive wives and angry husbands--but so are there in America...of course there might be more in one country or the other...but the terms of the debate should make you a little suspicious at how reality is defined by these simplistic images and one should look at the comparison image negatively being compared to? To the wife beater is the blonde, ivy-educated, sensitive, new age man or the civilized Westerner or to the meek, sexless Asian man is the bad boy white or black man...two mutally contradictory image sets but we are irrational when we'd like to think otherwise.

I don't think we're rude, wife beaters. Just using the "white man's" prejudice to see our own reality is to see a racist's dream. From the Japanese and Chinese and Coreans I've met--the older ones--much humanity, civility, gentleness in human relations yet also a great strength and agressiveness borne of hard conditions. And in America I've seen many rude, boorish, arrogant, insufferable fools. "Conservativism" is way too simplistic to describe some peoples...Not that all is roses but let's not be so one sided and simplistic in our discussions and images.
What?!    Sunday, June 30, 2002 at 00:18:47 (PDT)
In Corea they have changed the names of their cities to use the "ch" renedering as opposed to the "j". For example Cheju has now become Jeju. Well this Corea thing with the "C" has been re introduced to appear alphabetically before the J to come before Japan. However this "ch" to "j" has backfired. Now the Japanese have decided to do the opposite..."j" to "ch". So now instead of Japan it will be Chapan. Which still puts them ahead of Corea.
Giggler    Thursday, June 27, 2002 at 20:15:43 (PDT)
It's really a non-issue, but I think the Korea is aesthetically more pleasing. Corea looks weaker, and reminds me slightly of cholera, which is not a very pleasant association.

Also, what's the problem with "Peking"?
They still say it that way in Japan.
Desslar    Wednesday, June 26, 2002 at 10:23:32 (PDT)
http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~soon/essays/corea.html

I am eager to find out how this piece of opinionated and unsubstanciated garbage is in any way an 'objective observation', as was claimed by congaloo.
lol, lolisimo & lole    Wednesday, June 26, 2002 at 06:29:30 (PDT)
erm...
So you mean to say that the west changed the spelling of a nation because Japan didn't want a colony's name to start with C?
Damn, I didn't know we had that much sway over Europe and America as to be able to change a well-established name just like that. Simply brilliant, eh?
And there's Korea, still unable to have the west call it Hankuk.
Just me feeling a touch ridiculous?
lol, lolisimo & lole    Wednesday, June 26, 2002 at 05:59:40 (PDT)

NEWEST COMMENTS | EARLIER COMMENTS