Asian Air 
Imagemap

GOLDSEA | ASIAMS.NET | ASIAN AMERICAN ISSUES


KOREA OR COREA?
(Updated Tuesday, Apr 1, 2008, 06:07:01 PM.)

e at GoldSea choose to honor the more natural rendering commonly used in the English-speaking world prior to the Japanese annexation and colonialization of Corea beginning in 1905.
     American and English books published during the latter half of the 19th century generally referred to the nation as "Corea" as recently as the years immediately preceding Japan's formal annexation of Corea in 1910. An 1851 map of East Asia by Englishman John Tallis labels the nation Corea. The same spelling is used in The Mongols, a 1908 history of the Mongol race by Jeremiah Curtin, the world's foremost Asia scholar of the day, as well as in several books by American missionaries published between 1887 and 1905.
     Japan's annexation of Corea didn't become formal until 1910, but for all practical purposes Japan had become the power that regulated Corea's relations with the outside world in 1897 when it defeated China in a war over Japan's ambition to exercise control over Corea. The only other power willing to contest Japan's supremacy in the Corean peninsula was Russia. When it was easily defeated by Japan at Port Arthur in 1905, the annexation of Corea became a fait accompli. Anxious to avoid a costly Pacific conflict, President Wilson ignored the pleas of a delegation of Corean patriots and their American missionary supporters and turned a blind eye to Japan's acts of formal annexation and colonization of Corea. During that period Japan mounted a campaign to push for the "Korea" useage by the American press. Why? For one of Japan's prospective colonies to precede its master in the alphabetical lineup of nations would be unseemly, Japanese imperialists decided.
     Japan's colonial rule over Corea ended on August 15, 1945 when it lost World War II. Now that Corea is eagerly shedding the last vestiges of the colonial period, even demolishing public buildings erected by the Japanese (for example, the monstrously immense colonial governor's mansion), forward-thinking Corean and Corean American journalists, intellectuals and scholars are urging the American media to revert to the original, more natural rendering of Corea.
    The changeover will pose a problem only in English-speaking nations as other western nations never accepted the "K" spelling. For example, France, Spain, Italy, Brazil, Argentina and Mexico, among many others, use the "C" rendering.
     English convention, too, is on the side of the Corea rendering. Non-European names are romanized with a "C" (Cambodia, Canada, cocoa, Comanche, Congo, and even old Canton, for example) except where the first letter is followed by an "e" or an "i", (as in Kenya). Other than that, the "K" spelling is used only in connoting childlike ignorance of spelling conventions ("Kitty Kat" and "Skool", for examples).
     Therefore, the American "K" spelling is

  1. offensive from a historical standpoint (remember "Peking" and "Canton"?);
  2. violates western rendering conventions;
  3. suggests a lack of sophistication toward Corea; and
  4. by connoting naiveté, imputes a lack of sophistication to Corea and its people.

     The Corea rendering will ultimately become universal when more Americans are educated as to the offensive and relatively recent origin of the "Korea" rendering. The English-speaking world was responsible for agreeing to Japanese efforts to change the spelling of Corea's name in English useage. Who better than concerned Asian Americans to help change it back?

This interactive article is closed to new input.
Discussions posted during the past year remain available for browsing.

Asian American Videos


Films & Movies Channel


Humor Channel


Identity Channel


Vocals & Music Channel


Makeup & Hair Channel


Intercultural Channel


CONTACT US | ADVERTISING INFO

© 1996-2013 Asian Media Group Inc
No part of the contents of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission.

WHAT YOU SAY

[This page is closed to new input. --Ed.]
It's me again.

Dear celeste; when you claim something, please make sense. To claim that Japan changed "Corea" to "Korea", you should show evidence which can be accepted by most readers - instead of just repeating hiteric and groundless abuse/rumour on history.

Sense    Sunday, July 14, 2002 at 08:42:13 (PDT)
I just wanted to add to Dr. Berkeley's comment. I don't think Corea or Korea is offensive to a native Korean. The word Corea stems from the Corea dynasty, which stands before the Chosun dynasty. It was the time that the nation was first known to the world through trades with Arabians. You are mistaken with the kingdom of Go Gu Ryu (I don't know how they denote this kingdom in English, it's either GoGuRyu or KoKuRyu, I think). Go Gu Ryu is the one that existed with Silla and Bak-Jae. I didn't know about this at all and the article was very interesting.

-Yujin
Yujin    Sunday, July 14, 2002 at 00:09:53 (PDT)
Stop this nonsense. Why do you Chinese keep telling Korean to hate Japanese? The fact is, over 90% of the Koreans (who are not fooled by this Chinese propaganda) like Japan and condemns China, its long-term enemy, or other communist societies.

I know why the Chinese hate Japan so much -- The mass killing of Chinese peasants in Nanjing (Nanking) by Japanese soldiers in the weeks at the end of 1937 and beginning of 1938.

The Japanese soldiers (including a lot of Korean volunteers) fought against the evil China in WWII; the Korean soldiers also fought against the communists in Vietnam War (1961-64)

Japan and Korea are so similar in so many ways, both physically and culturally. In addition, it is well known fact that the Japanese royal family immigrated to Japan from Korea, landing somewhere on the island of Kyushu.

The past is the past and we do not live in the past. Perhaps, it is time for Korean and Japanese people to cooperate again, especially after successful World Cup 2002 Korea/Japan.
Dynamic Korea    Friday, July 12, 2002 at 20:40:06 (PDT)
As long as you don't adopt the British names or spelling, anything is OK. Britian was an oppressive colonizer of the many parts of the world and were responsible for much of the misery in this world. So don't give these barbarians any credit.
UK hater    Thursday, July 11, 2002 at 13:56:18 (PDT)
THE AUTHOR OF THE ARTICLE LEFT,

I fail to see any validity in this debate - the point of the COREA>KOREA spelling change was to create a more phonetic and consistent system (during the overhaul of the English language, out of which present-day American English has arisen - compare conventional British English spellings with their American English counterparts).

Admittedly, the British have preferred the K-spelling over the C-spelling.

If you are so concerned at such an insignificant thing as the spelling of the word 'Korea' by Americans, then why stop there? You may as well create an entire overhaul of English usage on this site, and revert to more conventional spelling methods;

Airplane > Aeroplane
Jail > Gaol
Tire > Tyre (noun), Tire (verb)
Defence > Defence (noun), Defense (verb)
Licence > Licence (noun), License (verb)
Traveling, Traveler > Travelling, Traveller
Jewelry > Jewellery
The list can go on.

I mean, afterall: these simplified American English spellings (and i quote), "connote naiveté" and "imputes a lack of sophistication" to the people of America - i mean, what? Are traditional English spellings too difficult for Americans to grasp, is that what American English implies? I mean, if the British, the Australians, the Indians (and the list can go on) write with the script, why are Americans given a dumbed-down one?

NOTE: it is spelt naïveté, with diaeresis above the 'i' (as opposed to the way /you/ spelt it, naiveté) - of course, it is perfectly acceptable without the diaeresis or the accent mark - but if you choose to use the traditional spelling, as least make sure you get it completely correct!

All i have to say on the matter is, stop living in the past.

Bob the Builder    Friday, July 05, 2002 at 17:44:34 (PDT)

[Not only do you not read before posting, you are devoid of any sense of relevance. Your shall serve as an example for others like you. --Ed]
I am not an expert on the Corean language.

Please inform and/or correct if the "Han" in Hanguk (Corea) is the same "Han" as the Chinese dynasty? "Guk" is from the Chinese "guo" (Mandarin), "gok" (Cantonese) meaning "country or land of."

I know that Chosun is from the Chinese "Chaoxian" (land of morning calm).
Fred    Thursday, July 04, 2002 at 23:10:49 (PDT)
As for that Japanese reader who commented above, isn't it just so like you guys to deny what is already history. Check your books again, Sense and this time try to check the ones that your historians haven't distorted. Japan has not recieved its historically just dues for the decades horrific humiliation and colonisation it placed on other Asian countries.

Why am I not surprised that you have the gall to laugh at a country's attempt to revitalise itself after the effects of the cruelty of Japan rule.
celeste    Tuesday, July 02, 2002 at 11:09:13 (PDT)
Korea or Corea is both offensive to a native Korean. Native Koreans call their country (translated) 'Han-Nation'. Korea stems from western colonial times when they identified the Korean penninsula and parts of Manchuria were divided into three vassal territories (kingdom's) of China: Silla, Bak-Jae and Corea.

Calling the country Korea would be like calling the US, Louisinana.

Dr. Berkeley

Dr. Berkeley    Monday, July 01, 2002 at 15:58:57 (PDT)
Change it back to 'C' and make Japan Nippon.
Nippon jin    Monday, July 01, 2002 at 13:21:11 (PDT)
a superb analysis!
pinus    Sunday, June 30, 2002 at 16:36:33 (PDT)
I, as a Japanese, was surprised to hear this story recently - that Japan changed "Corea" to "Korea". Then I referred to the Compact OED and a few books on history. The result is that "Corea" mostly changed to "Korea" in English even decades before the colonisation by Japan. Well, the world will laugh at "Coreanism" rather than the Japanese colonialism.

Sense    Saturday, June 29, 2002 at 11:40:25 (PDT)
I know the Japanese and the Japanese consciousness--at least I think I do. I dare them to change Japan or Nippon to "Chapan." It's not happening. It's like asking Nippon to teach its citizens about the atrocities committed by the Japanese Imperialists before, during, and after World War II--that's not going to happen anytime soon, either.

Korea to "Corea," however, is a real possibility. I see this happening in the future. We'll see what happens.
Asian-American History Educated    Saturday, June 29, 2002 at 00:11:07 (PDT)
Change it back to 'C' and make Japan Zapan
COREA    Friday, June 28, 2002 at 17:01:01 (PDT)

NEWEST COMMENTS | EARLIER COMMENTS