Asian Air 
Imagemap

GOLDSEA | ASIAMS.NET | ASIAN AMERICAN ISSUES


TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
OR UNIFICATION?

(Updated Wednesday, Jan 22, 2025, 06:38:55 AM)

he most pressing Asian foreign policy issue currently faced by the U.S. is the Taiwan question. The email we receive in reaction to our articles relating to this issue suggests that it's an emotional one for many of our readers. Perhaps one reason for the emotion is the fact that the issue isn't amenable to an easy or simple solution.
     The first historical mention of Taiwan appears to have been when Portugese traders found it to be a resting place on their journey to Japan and named it Isla Formosa. Beijing's claim to Taiwan dates back to the 16th century when a Chinese general fought off the Portugese to claim the island for the emperor. In 1895 the expansion-minded Japanese annexed it after defeating China in a war on the Corean peninsula. China briefly reestablished sovereignty over Taiwan following Japan's defeat in August of 1945.
     At the time the official government of China, as recognized by most nations of the world, was under the control of the Kuomingtang headed by Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek. He was engaged in a desperate war against Mao Tse-tung's peasant army. Despite billions of dollars of aid by the U.S. based mainly on intensely partisan reporting by Henry Luce's Time/Life empire, the spectacularly corrupt Chiang lost that war and fled to Taiwan with 2.5 million followers.

     He established the present government of Taiwan on December 7, 1949 and proclaimed it the sole legitimate government of all China. Mao made the same claim. The claims competed until 1971 when it became clear to most of the world that Mao's was more persuasive. Taiwan was kicked out of the UN. The Beijing government took its place as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, a seat given in recognition of China's role in fighting Japan in World War II.
     Mired in its own misguided war in Vietnam, and intensely fearful of anything red, the U.S. was one of the last nations to recognize the legitimacy of Mao's government. In 1972 Richard Nixon made his historic journey to Beijing. In 1976 the U.S. took the next step by recognizing the People's Republic as China's sole legitimate government. It began pursuing the "One China, One Taiwan" policy under which official diplomatic contacts were exclusively with Beijing but continued to sell billions of dollars a year of fighter jets, helicopters, tanks and missiles to Taiwan to help defend against a possible Chinese effort to refunify by force.
     In 1997 President Clinton declared a "strategic partnership" with Beijing over intense Republican objections. It was an astute recognition of the fact that China's 1.2 billion people must be accorded a central place in U.S. foreign policy. But the historic, moral and economic ties that bind the U.S. to Taiwan's 23 million people stand squarely in the way of cutting off arms sales and renouncing the pact under which the U.S. obliged itself to come to Taiwan's defense in the event of attack by China. That U.S. pledge and continuing arms sales continue to inflame Beijing to periodic bursts of violent anti-U.S. rhetoric.
     Taiwan has been a domocracy since 1989 when it legalized opposition parties. It held its first democratic presidential elections in 1990. Lee Teng-hui handily won to keep the presidency which he had originally gained in 1988. Lee won again in 1996. Since 1997 he began efforts to warm up relations with Beijing by agreeing to enter into negotiations under a "One-China" framework with an eye toward eventual reunification. Beijing's leaders continued their highly successful campaign of pressuring diplomatic partners into severing ties with Taiwan. China even raised hell when Lee made a semi-surreptitious trip to New York in 1997. Since then China has scared neighborning nations like the Philippines into not allowing Lee to enter. As of 1999 Taiwan's diplomatic allies number about 18 out of about 220 nations on earth. All are tiny, impoverished Central American, African and Pacific Island nations that appreciate Taiwan's generous aid packages. Pago Pago is considered a major ally.
     Feisty Lee Teng-hui launched his own guerilla offensive in July, 1999 by declaring over German radio that Taiwan was in fact a separate state and would negotiate with Beijing on an equal footing. That sent Beijing into a tizzy. It fired off bombastic threats to take Taiwan by force and to annhilate the U.S. Navy if it intervenes. On October 18 during his British visit Chinese President Jiang Zemin assumed a softer, more relaxed tone in telling a London newspaper that China would be peacefully reunited with Taiwan under a one-nation two-systems formula by the middle of the next century. One might have expected Lee to have been relieved by that statement. Instead, he brushed it aside as "a hoax". China should try instead to set a timetable for its democratization as that was the only way to ensure reunification, sneered Lee's Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi. Most polls show that a clear majority of Taiwanese prefer to maintain the status quo indefinitely rather than moving toward unification.
     Beijing's reunification mandate appears based on the idea that in winning the mainland, the Chinese people had rejected the "criminal" Kuomingtang and its right to rule any part of China. It also sees Taiwan as a galling symbol of the division wrought and preserved by western imperialists -- namely, the U.S. -- seeking to enjoy global hegemony at the expense of Chinese dignity.
     Meanwhile the U.S. remains on the hook to defend Taiwan and sell it arms though doing so keeps its relations with a quarter of humanity rocky and on edge. Under its current policy the U.S. is the asbestos firewall that keeps friction between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait from igniting into war.
     Should the U.S. continue alienating Beijing to help Taiwan protect its independence or improve relations with China by pressuring Taiwan to reunite?

This interactive article is closed to new input.
Discussions posted during the past year remain available for browsing.

Asian American Videos


Films & Movies Channel


Humor Channel


Identity Channel


Vocals & Music Channel


Makeup & Hair Channel


Intercultural Channel

CONTACT US | ADVERTISING INFO

© 1996-2013 Asian Media Group Inc
No part of the contents of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission.

WHAT YOU SAY

[This page is closed to new input. --Ed.]
Apache

In a effort to mend fences, I am sorry (actual use and meaning of the word not attempting to make up BS like US gov against china in spy plane incident) for the misunderstanding we may have had before. I must say, I admire your courage to admit faults and mistakes. Only a strong man can do that.

AHL grad

Too bad I cant say the same for you. You have not provided a logical argument on this froum. Its hard to respect a man who denies his roots and repeadtly makes uncalled and unfounded accusations ec "chicom" and claiming my statements are PRC "propaganda". Further more, I doubt you were an officer in the naval acadamy and became a pilot or "driver" of a f-14 tomcat. Most naval officers are highly intelligent and logical resonable capabale men. You on the other hand... well, I wont get into that.

Everyone:

I hope we can develop mutual respect for each other, or at least respectful tolerance. No need for childish antics that have been produced thus far.

I think it is best for all of us to discuss this sensitive issue logically with the best interest of both americans and chinese (roc+prc).
SOG    Tuesday, September 17, 2002 at 13:50:27 (PDT)    [128.193.169.87]

Apache, AHL grad

old PRC lies and propaganda?

UMM nah. Was chiang hai chek not made cheif commander of chinese forces to fight japanese invastion? yes he was.

Did he in fact order the chinese troops to stand down duing actual japanese attacks on chinese military bases? yes he did.

Did taiwanese take billions of dollars of gold bullion to taiwan from chinese treasury? yes they did.

Did the description of the pathetic taiwanese navy come from taiwanese officers? sure he said them.

So AHL grad. Which of my statements is propaganda. And apache please feel free to enlighten my blinded mind of PRC lies.

Apache

I suggest you dont forget your roots. Bashing the PRC is like bashing yourselfs. In the eyes of white america, you are always chinese american. Emphasize on chinese. Lets not kid ourselves here. Ditto for AHL grad.

I aint saying america dosent treat you like her own, but the fact remains, people will always ask you were you come from. Last week this guy asked me that, I said "USA" and he said, "no, where do you really come from".

I am not suggesting giving your loyalty to china by any means. But the well being of your chinese compatriots will directly affect your status here in america. If china and US have a confrontation, do you think americans can really differentiate you from a PRC national?. Not likly, you will face the same rejection and hostility. Like wise if the PRC and the chinese people succeed in developing a powerful military and economic system, you too my friend will share in the glory. ditto for AHL grad.

Lets not kid our selves here. The improvemnet of our asian countries directly and significantly affects our status in the united states. If china becomes a superpower all asians in the world will receive a significant status boost.
SOG    Tuesday, September 17, 2002 at 13:27:52 (PDT)    [128.193.169.87]
Apache Driver:

This is Fan again...
My email is deedee2003@chek.com
Hope to hear from you...
A porsche Driver...    Monday, September 16, 2002 at 21:50:03 (PDT)    [67.241.61.122]

NEWEST COMMENTS | EARLIER COMMENTS