Asian Air 
Imagemap

GOLDSEA | ASIAMS.NET | ASIAN AMERICAN ISSUES


TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
OR UNIFICATION?

(Updated Wednesday, Jan 22, 2025, 06:38:55 AM)

he most pressing Asian foreign policy issue currently faced by the U.S. is the Taiwan question. The email we receive in reaction to our articles relating to this issue suggests that it's an emotional one for many of our readers. Perhaps one reason for the emotion is the fact that the issue isn't amenable to an easy or simple solution.
     The first historical mention of Taiwan appears to have been when Portugese traders found it to be a resting place on their journey to Japan and named it Isla Formosa. Beijing's claim to Taiwan dates back to the 16th century when a Chinese general fought off the Portugese to claim the island for the emperor. In 1895 the expansion-minded Japanese annexed it after defeating China in a war on the Corean peninsula. China briefly reestablished sovereignty over Taiwan following Japan's defeat in August of 1945.
     At the time the official government of China, as recognized by most nations of the world, was under the control of the Kuomingtang headed by Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek. He was engaged in a desperate war against Mao Tse-tung's peasant army. Despite billions of dollars of aid by the U.S. based mainly on intensely partisan reporting by Henry Luce's Time/Life empire, the spectacularly corrupt Chiang lost that war and fled to Taiwan with 2.5 million followers.

     He established the present government of Taiwan on December 7, 1949 and proclaimed it the sole legitimate government of all China. Mao made the same claim. The claims competed until 1971 when it became clear to most of the world that Mao's was more persuasive. Taiwan was kicked out of the UN. The Beijing government took its place as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, a seat given in recognition of China's role in fighting Japan in World War II.
     Mired in its own misguided war in Vietnam, and intensely fearful of anything red, the U.S. was one of the last nations to recognize the legitimacy of Mao's government. In 1972 Richard Nixon made his historic journey to Beijing. In 1976 the U.S. took the next step by recognizing the People's Republic as China's sole legitimate government. It began pursuing the "One China, One Taiwan" policy under which official diplomatic contacts were exclusively with Beijing but continued to sell billions of dollars a year of fighter jets, helicopters, tanks and missiles to Taiwan to help defend against a possible Chinese effort to refunify by force.
     In 1997 President Clinton declared a "strategic partnership" with Beijing over intense Republican objections. It was an astute recognition of the fact that China's 1.2 billion people must be accorded a central place in U.S. foreign policy. But the historic, moral and economic ties that bind the U.S. to Taiwan's 23 million people stand squarely in the way of cutting off arms sales and renouncing the pact under which the U.S. obliged itself to come to Taiwan's defense in the event of attack by China. That U.S. pledge and continuing arms sales continue to inflame Beijing to periodic bursts of violent anti-U.S. rhetoric.
     Taiwan has been a domocracy since 1989 when it legalized opposition parties. It held its first democratic presidential elections in 1990. Lee Teng-hui handily won to keep the presidency which he had originally gained in 1988. Lee won again in 1996. Since 1997 he began efforts to warm up relations with Beijing by agreeing to enter into negotiations under a "One-China" framework with an eye toward eventual reunification. Beijing's leaders continued their highly successful campaign of pressuring diplomatic partners into severing ties with Taiwan. China even raised hell when Lee made a semi-surreptitious trip to New York in 1997. Since then China has scared neighborning nations like the Philippines into not allowing Lee to enter. As of 1999 Taiwan's diplomatic allies number about 18 out of about 220 nations on earth. All are tiny, impoverished Central American, African and Pacific Island nations that appreciate Taiwan's generous aid packages. Pago Pago is considered a major ally.
     Feisty Lee Teng-hui launched his own guerilla offensive in July, 1999 by declaring over German radio that Taiwan was in fact a separate state and would negotiate with Beijing on an equal footing. That sent Beijing into a tizzy. It fired off bombastic threats to take Taiwan by force and to annhilate the U.S. Navy if it intervenes. On October 18 during his British visit Chinese President Jiang Zemin assumed a softer, more relaxed tone in telling a London newspaper that China would be peacefully reunited with Taiwan under a one-nation two-systems formula by the middle of the next century. One might have expected Lee to have been relieved by that statement. Instead, he brushed it aside as "a hoax". China should try instead to set a timetable for its democratization as that was the only way to ensure reunification, sneered Lee's Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi. Most polls show that a clear majority of Taiwanese prefer to maintain the status quo indefinitely rather than moving toward unification.
     Beijing's reunification mandate appears based on the idea that in winning the mainland, the Chinese people had rejected the "criminal" Kuomingtang and its right to rule any part of China. It also sees Taiwan as a galling symbol of the division wrought and preserved by western imperialists -- namely, the U.S. -- seeking to enjoy global hegemony at the expense of Chinese dignity.
     Meanwhile the U.S. remains on the hook to defend Taiwan and sell it arms though doing so keeps its relations with a quarter of humanity rocky and on edge. Under its current policy the U.S. is the asbestos firewall that keeps friction between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait from igniting into war.
     Should the U.S. continue alienating Beijing to help Taiwan protect its independence or improve relations with China by pressuring Taiwan to reunite?

This interactive article is closed to new input.
Discussions posted during the past year remain available for browsing.

Asian American Videos


Films & Movies Channel


Humor Channel


Identity Channel


Vocals & Music Channel


Makeup & Hair Channel


Intercultural Channel

CONTACT US | ADVERTISING INFO

© 1996-2013 Asian Media Group Inc
No part of the contents of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission.

WHAT YOU SAY

[This page is closed to new input. --Ed.]
On Independence:

"They would be dead if they did that. It is a reality of the times."
-AC Dropout

"Regardless taiwan will never be
independent. That will be virtually impossiable."
-SOG

Just to point out, the reason Taiwan would be dead if it declared independence, and thus making the affair "impossible" is because China would attack.

Independence is not impossible because Taiwan is too small, or too poor or doesn't know how to govern itself.

Independence is "impossible" because the PRC won't let it happen.

Likewise, I am perfect capable of managing my own life and taking care of my own assets. If one hundred armed men were to come into my room and demand that I submit to their authority and hand over all my money and freedom, my independence would be impossible.

A schoolboy can keep his milk money unless the bully beat him up and take it away. The bully make the schoolboy's financial independence impossible. Thus the schoolboy should not have independence! Fabulous logic.

As Chinese, I want Taiwan and China together because it is good for all of us, not because China is a bully.
Linwei    Friday, September 20, 2002 at 11:28:30 (PDT)    [132.200.32.33]

Real Truth,

"Your perception of the CCP is outdated. The CCP is trying to model itself after the Singaporean type of elitist government. Singapore has the cleanest, least corrupt government in all of Asia.
Your originating from Singapore, you should be flattered. http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/iaps/TomlinsonLecture2002.pdf http://asia.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/east/04/14/china.willycolumn/"

I'm aware of what they say, and I'm aware there's a big disconnect with that and the reality of the present day. They have a long, long, long way to go.

My statements were reflective of today and my dealings with the CCP, not ruminations of a pie-in-the-sky future goal post. They can say what they will--let's see them get there.
Apache Driver    Friday, September 20, 2002 at 10:52:27 (PDT)    [24.44.167.125]
Even the AIT (American Institute in Taiwan) has suggested to Pres Chen SB direct that it is not in Taiwan interest to be economically isolated from China.

AIT is the basically the American Embassy in Taiwan that is pro-independence.
AC Dropout    Friday, September 20, 2002 at 10:39:25 (PDT)    [24.90.98.143]
Three dots,

You need 6 dots to be a true fighting monk.
AC Dropout    Friday, September 20, 2002 at 10:33:51 (PDT)    [24.90.98.143]
Apache Driver,

Your perception of the CCP is outdated. The CCP is trying to model itself after the Singaporean type of elitist government. Singapore has the cleanest, least corrupt government in all of Asia.
Your originating from Singapore, you should be flattered. http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/iaps/TomlinsonLecture2002.pdf http://asia.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/east/04/14/china.willycolumn/
The Real Truth    Thursday, September 19, 2002 at 21:51:39 (PDT)    [209.232.27.209]
Porsche

"So...is this how you express your pride of being Chinese outside of Goldsea...?"

Chinese American. I will never forget that.

Apache.

First and foremost, my loyalty is to God. My loyalty is to justice, peace and doing what is right. This condition supercedes all other loyalties be it family, country or friend. Only by doing this will people ensure a brighter tomarrow. Blind natiionalistic pride is actually quite harmful. EC US in veitnam, Nazis etc.

Second, my loyalty rests with the United States. I once was a zealous and idiotic nationalistic patriotic fool for the US. I would tout the power of the US at any given occasion and defend her actions to anyone. I realized however it is harmful to US and the rest of the world. US has plenty of arrogant people. I will never forget my roots though. Although undoubtly a loyal citizen of the US I wish for china to become a great power. I have chinese blood in me and that can and will never be denied.

You know my stance on taiwan well by now. Logically in the long run taiwan will benefit by uniting with the mainland. Regardless taiwan will never be independent. That will be virtually impossiable. China is moving more and more toward a capitalistic society if not already and US is more into a state controlled market. There is no pure markets out there, by economic reasoning all markets move towards each other. Anyways, I hope you can objectivly understand taiwan has no chance militarily from seceding from china. China is the largets export market of taiwan last count 23% and growing, taiwan economy will literally be shattered within the next 20 years if she does not unite with the mainland. Markets always seek the most effecient route, given the technological gap closing between the two sides, china will win out on the contracts until parity is reached. The end conclusion is chinese standard of living will be equivelent to taiwan.
SOG    Thursday, September 19, 2002 at 11:44:50 (PDT)    [128.193.169.67]
SOG:

You can't even distinguish the Chinese people from the CCP...
A typical sign of callow thinking....
...    Thursday, September 19, 2002 at 10:40:35 (PDT)    [165.138.26.221]
"The CCP distorts or inconsistently recalls past events in China's long, long history for its own purposes, in an attempt to foster something which was virtually unknown in China for thousands of years: Nationalism."

It is statement like this one where I have to question why it is a problem for Chinese to have nationalism. 200 years ago the 13 states literally disbanded the first federal government in the USA. Every country has a mythos that is used to foster nationalism and propoganda to keep itself cohesive.

"they (PRC) maneuver themselves into a potential confrontation with the US over Taiwan."

This is another statement that is some biased. The whole Cold War was about containing the USSR and their communist allies. Just like Asian countries have outdated foriegn policy, so does the USA. To make a blanket statement that the PRC instigated this mess (strait issue) is very very far from the truth and facts of the situation.

"For one, we've got to stop this clannish tendency to remain isolated within our own communities"

Hello...assimilation is a two way street. Not to say Chinese American don't self segregate. However, you cannot deny the tendency of the mainstream to view asians as outsiders. As with the typical question "Where your from?" and the response of "USA" is unacceptable, even from unaccented English speaking fully educated in the USA asians.

But in any event the CCP like all asian govern't have a sorid past. Not because they are don't have morals. It is because Asia was a mess from colonialism. There is not one asian country that was not touched by imperialism from Europe or the USA in the 20th century.

However the CCP government is going on the right path.

"I do feel Taiwan would be better off as a totally separate entity from China."

They would be dead if they did that. It is a reality of the times. Also the nation as a whole is divided on the issue. I believe that Taiwan becoming more like Ireland is probably more realistic at this point. With districts aligning with PRC and districts wanting to be independent.

It is almost like saying Native American would be better off with their own real UN sanctioned nation. Not really a possibility, nor should it be entertained by any true blue USA citizen.
AC Dropout    Thursday, September 19, 2002 at 10:20:52 (PDT)    [24.90.98.143]

NEWEST COMMENTS | EARLIER COMMENTS