|
|
|
|
GOLDSEA |
ASIAMS.NET |
ASIAN AMERICAN ISSUES
TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
OR UNIFICATION?
(Updated
Wednesday, Jan 22, 2025, 06:38:55 AM)
he most pressing Asian foreign policy issue currently faced by the U.S. is the Taiwan question. The email we receive in reaction to our articles relating to this issue suggests that it's an emotional one for many of our readers. Perhaps one reason for the emotion is the fact that the issue isn't amenable to an easy or simple solution.
The first historical mention of Taiwan appears to have been when Portugese traders found it to be a resting place on their journey to Japan and named it Isla Formosa. Beijing's claim to Taiwan dates back to the 16th century when a Chinese general fought off the Portugese to claim the island for the emperor. In 1895 the expansion-minded Japanese annexed it after defeating China in a war on the Corean peninsula. China briefly reestablished sovereignty over Taiwan following Japan's defeat in August of 1945.
At the time the official government of China, as recognized by most nations of the world, was under the control of the Kuomingtang headed by Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek. He was engaged in a desperate war against Mao Tse-tung's peasant army. Despite billions of dollars of aid by the U.S. based mainly on intensely partisan reporting by Henry Luce's Time/Life empire, the spectacularly corrupt Chiang lost that war and fled to Taiwan with 2.5 million followers.
He established the present government of Taiwan on December 7, 1949 and proclaimed it the sole legitimate government of all China. Mao made the same claim. The claims competed until 1971 when it became clear to most of the world that Mao's was more persuasive. Taiwan was kicked out of the UN. The Beijing government took its place as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, a seat given in recognition of China's role in fighting Japan in World War II.
Mired in its own misguided war in Vietnam, and intensely fearful of anything red, the U.S. was one of the last nations to recognize the legitimacy of Mao's government. In 1972 Richard Nixon made his historic journey to Beijing. In 1976 the U.S. took the next step by recognizing the People's Republic as China's sole legitimate government. It began pursuing the "One China, One Taiwan" policy under which official diplomatic contacts were exclusively with Beijing but continued to sell billions of dollars a year of fighter jets, helicopters, tanks and missiles to Taiwan to help defend against a possible Chinese effort to refunify by force.
In 1997 President Clinton declared a "strategic partnership" with Beijing over intense Republican objections. It was an astute recognition of the fact that China's 1.2 billion people must be accorded a central place in U.S. foreign policy. But the historic, moral and economic ties that bind the U.S. to Taiwan's 23 million people stand squarely in the way of cutting off arms sales and renouncing the pact under which the U.S. obliged itself to come to Taiwan's defense in the event of attack by China. That U.S. pledge and continuing arms sales continue to inflame Beijing to periodic bursts of violent anti-U.S. rhetoric.
Taiwan has been a domocracy since 1989 when it legalized opposition parties. It held its first democratic presidential elections in 1990. Lee Teng-hui handily won to keep the presidency which he had originally gained in 1988. Lee won again in 1996. Since 1997 he began efforts to warm up relations with Beijing by agreeing to enter into negotiations under a "One-China" framework with an eye toward eventual reunification. Beijing's leaders continued their highly successful campaign of pressuring diplomatic partners into severing ties with Taiwan. China even raised hell when Lee made a semi-surreptitious trip to New York in 1997. Since then China has scared neighborning nations like the Philippines into not allowing Lee to enter. As of 1999 Taiwan's diplomatic allies number about 18 out of about 220 nations on earth. All are tiny, impoverished Central American, African and Pacific Island nations that appreciate Taiwan's generous aid packages. Pago Pago is considered a major ally.
Feisty Lee Teng-hui launched his own guerilla offensive in July, 1999 by declaring over German radio that Taiwan was in fact a separate state and would negotiate with Beijing on an equal footing. That sent Beijing into a tizzy. It fired off bombastic threats to take Taiwan by force and to annhilate the U.S. Navy if it intervenes. On October 18 during his British visit Chinese President Jiang Zemin assumed a softer, more relaxed tone in telling a London newspaper that China would be peacefully reunited with Taiwan under a one-nation two-systems formula by the middle of the next century. One might have expected Lee to have been relieved by that statement. Instead, he brushed it aside as "a hoax". China should try instead to set a timetable for its democratization as that was the only way to ensure reunification, sneered Lee's Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi. Most polls show that a clear majority of Taiwanese prefer to maintain the status quo indefinitely rather than moving toward unification.
Beijing's reunification mandate appears based on the idea that in winning the mainland, the Chinese people had rejected the "criminal" Kuomingtang and its right to rule any part of China. It also sees Taiwan as a galling symbol of the division wrought and preserved by western imperialists -- namely, the U.S. -- seeking to enjoy global hegemony at the expense of Chinese dignity.
Meanwhile the U.S. remains on the hook to defend Taiwan and sell it arms though doing so keeps its relations with a quarter of humanity rocky and on edge. Under its current policy the U.S. is the asbestos firewall that keeps friction between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait from igniting into war.
Should the U.S. continue alienating Beijing to help Taiwan protect its independence or improve relations with China by pressuring Taiwan to reunite?
This interactive article is closed to new input.
Discussions posted during the past year remain available for browsing.
CONTACT US
|
ADVERTISING INFO
© 1996-2013 Asian Media Group Inc
No part of the contents of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission.
|
|
|
|
WHAT YOU SAY
[This page is closed to new input. --Ed.]
sean
is it necessary for taiwan to declare independence and form their own ethncity?
if they want to.
is their culture threatened by china?
culture is an abstract idea. culture is a people's way of life. for a long time, taiwan has been democratic. they want to join china but now lose their democratic system. if china is a one party system and taiwan was forced to change their long-time democracy then yes their culture is threatened. the people of taiwan are quite prosperous. as opposed to shanghai, the prc's most "rich city" which is basically a handfull of pretty buildings intruded and surrounded by poverty. the people of taiwan no more want to be communist as they do poor.
are their freedoms threatened by china?
absolutely. they lose the freedom to have unions, the freedom to protest government actions and the freedom to think. have you ever sat down with a person grown up in the prc? they are commanded to follow the government and to follow the elders....what results is a person who believes anything they are told and is afriad to speak out against everything. like a zombie. when you speak out against something in front of them they make constant excuses to protect the leadership.
to me china is like
#1 a beehive
#2 the borg
or #3 an ant colony.
What do I see?
the number of Falun GOng deaths outside of China as suppossed to inside. The fact these things may have never happened ( Actors, Spun news stories,etc) and a Government filled with LIES beyond lies.
Is their language threatened? No.
OK ill take your word for it
Are the mainland Chinese destroying Taiwan's environment and its living standard? No.
The 400 Missles in Fujian pointed at Taiwan Tell me different. UNLESS maybe you believe they are all filled with Potporri?
Jing Cha.   
Saturday, September 28, 2002 at 21:53:31 (PDT)
   [61.170.128.96]
the facts i know about taiwan (no opinions)
-the people of china believe that taiwan is china's to deal with as it wishes.
-the prc government's steam pressed communist inclined, spun news stories would have the people of china believe that taiwan wants to be part of china but america is standing in the way.
if you think im lying, yesterday i read a fine news article labeled
( china tells taiwan's falun gong to stop hijaking satellites)
:-/
- most chinese do not know that taiwan and america have defence treaties giving america intercession ability.
-china has hundreds of missles in fujian province trained on taiwan
- china threatens to attack taiwan if it declares statehood.
-because taiwan is technically a rogue nation, the un doesnt recognize it as a country so if taiwan doesnt declare stehood, the un cant neccessarily protect it under the articles of war.
- taiwan's elders want to be part of china but the youth do not want to be part of china so they are split almost 50/50.
what do i think?
geographocally (examining tectonic plate movements ala pangean earth) taiwan is a part of china but under that theory, so is japan, and korea.
i believe that if taiwan was filled with english people or russians rather than chiense, china wouldnt dare threaten it. china is doing what it is doing because the people in taiwan are chinese. if they were of any other ethnic group, china would back off.
legally: the flag in taiwan's capitol is not that of the prc thus taiwan is not a part of the prc government (read: under articles of war, the flag that flies on the nation's capitol identifies its protectorate or government) when i see the prc flag on top of the capitol, thats when ill recognize taiwan as part of china.
militarily:
america wants to continue using taiwan to spy on the prc. america has unofficial bases there for landing troops and carrying in weapons. america is my government and i am certain that my government will do what it can to protect the people of taiwan as long as it fits with our ambitions.
jing cha.   
saturday, september 28, 2002 at 21:40:49 (pdt)
   [61.170.128.96]
SOG,
Since I live in North America, I support my home. I've lived all but 3 years of my life in Canada. Why would I support it's enemies? Well, unless I was one of those Chinese student spies.
China is about as familiar to me as Africa.
Kiss white booty? You should read some other forums.
P.S. Tomahawks are not exactly the most hitech weapon America has. China can copy all they want, unless their aim is to surpass, it won't do them anygood. When China refines its cruise missile, America will have a thousand other things to throw at them.
Anyway, an attack on Iraq would be good to remind the world that America is the only country that can choose where it fights. You hit them once, they'll hit you back 100 times harder (i.e. Afghanistan). You take out 2 buildings, they'll take out your country.
huu76   
Saturday, September 28, 2002 at 06:49:13 (PDT)
   [207.164.88.163]
It would not to china good to build CVG battle groups. She has long ago the capability to build carriers.
Modernization of the PLAN will be depedent on the new generation of dystroyers and SSBNs.
Carriers are not necassary to take taiwan as china is a unsinkable carrier right along side taiwan. A carrier only is costly target for US forces.
SOG   
Friday, September 27, 2002 at 13:42:06 (PDT)
   [216.239.163.153]
Sean,
How...nice...to hear from you again.
"I come from the United States of America, son. And I speak and write fluently and eloquently that language they use here."
Well son (assuming you're over 40 and old enough to address me as such yourself), you had me convinced otherwise.
"Yeah I guess I'm conversing in Chinese with you. How graceful of you to post idiotic attacks."
Who started the attacks here? I believe that was you purporting I'm a white guy married to a Taiwanese. Neither is true.
Tell me really. What utility is there in being a white pretending to be a Chinese? Does it increase my cachet here, given that a lot of my views are in direct opposition to those a lot of you hold dear? Seems a waste of energy and time. I offer only examples from a different point of view. Of course, your response is to be generally offensive as hell in lowering it to the lowest racial denominator.
I come from Singapore. You come from the US, by your own admission. Does this give you a special ability to divine the truth, an ability greater than mine?
I remain unconvinced.
Apache Driver   
Friday, September 27, 2002 at 09:06:40 (PDT)
   [67.84.132.190]
NEWEST COMMENTS |
EARLIER COMMENTS
|