To the Stars
by George Takei
Pocket Books/Simon & Schuster
New York, 1994, 406pp, $14
The boyhood and young manhood of a Japanese American actor who is much more than Star Trek's Mr Sulu


emories are our most precious possessions. They are the ultimate connective links to our past. My internment camp remembrances may be only a child's fragments of history, incomplete, disjointed and simplistically intense. But I treasure every piece and broken shard, every brief and unfinished wisp of memory I have. Especially of that strange and dreamlike night when something woke me up‹a sound, a discomfort, or perhaps intuition. I don't know what. Something stirred me from my sleep.
     I woke and saw a dim light glowing from the far side of our room. It was the kerosene lamp placed in the low chair Daddy had built. Daddy and Mama were seated over it whispering. His voice was hushed, thoughtful, sober. Mama sat ramrod straight. There was something strong and determined about her posture. Her face was expressionless, but the light shone in two shiny wet streaks down her cheeks. She looked like she had tears streaming down her face.
     There was a long silent pause, then Mama whispered something slowly and deliberately. She didn't talk like she was crying. But when she breathed in, the tears in her nose made a soft sniffling sound. It was strange. Mama sounded like she was crying without acting like it.
     "Mama, don't cry," I said in a drowsy murmur. They both looked over at me, startled. "Don't cry, Mama," I repeated. They tiptoed over in their stocking feet, Mama wiping her face.
     "Everything's all right. Go back to sleep. Mama and I were talking about grownup things," Daddy whispered.
     "Shhhh," Mama said softly. "Everything fine." And she tucked me back in. Reassured by that, I must have drifted back to sleep. That's all I remember of that momentary waking. It wasn't a dream. It really happened.
     Over the years I have come to cherish that breath of consciousness I was somehow granted. Because of it, I can claim witness to a discussion on a devastating event that again set the Japanese American internees reeling with confusion, shock and anger. That sleep-fuzzed memory is my only connection with a wrenching decision Daddy and Mama had to make. Their decision was again to have us packing for another arduous journey‹this time for a camp back in California, so poetically named Tule Lake.
     By early 1943, the political winds of America were charged with the racist rhetoric of politicians like Earl Warren, the attorney general of California. He became governor of the state riding on a fear campaign of potential Japanese American sabotage. The already volatile war climate was inflamed by Warren with his charges of possible Japanese American spying‹what he called fifth-column subversive activity.
     In actual fact, there was not a single case of treason by Americans of Japanese ancestry. The only American citizens arrested for espionage against the United States during the entire war were two Caucasians. Yet, disregarding the facts and blind to the pain, injury, and anguish inflicted in pitiless succession on an already incarcerated people, the desk-bound bureaucrats of Washington responded with alacrity. They devised a program of astounding cruelty. It was a plan to document the loyalty of Japanese Americans held behind barbed wire. As the ultimate proof of fidelity to the United States, all male and female internees aged seventeen and older, regardless of citizenship, were required to respond to a Loyalty Questionnaire. The questionnaire listed dozens of questions. The two most crucial questions were Number 27 and Number 28:

No. 27. Are you willing to serve in the Armed forces of the United States on combat duty wherever ordered?

No. 28. Will you swear unqualified allegiance to the United States of America and faithfully defend the United States from any or all attack by foreign of domestic forces, and forswear any form of allegiance or obedience to the Japanese emperor, to any other foreign government, power or organization?

     When Pearl Harbor was bombed in December 1941, many young Japanese American men, like most American men of their age, had rushed to their recruitment offices to volunteer for service. These genuine acts of loyalty were answered with a slap in the face. The men were summarily rejected and classified 4C, the same category as enemy aliens. Those already in the military at the time of Pearl Harbor--and there were approximately five thousand young Japanese men in uniform at the outbreak of the war--suffered the humiliation of being stripped of their weapons. Some even had to endure the outrage of being thrown into the stockade like common criminals. The fever pitch of anti-Japanese hysteria was epitomized by General John L. DeWitt, the commanding general of the Western Theater of Operation. DeWitt stated, "A Jap's a Jap... It makes no difference whether he is an American or not. Theoretically he is still a Japanese, and you can't change him."
     But with the war effort consuming manpower, President Roosevelt made a 180-degree turn in policy. He declared in February 1943, "No loyal citizen of the United States should be denied the democratic right to exercise the responsibilities of his citizenship regardless of ancestry." Japanese Americans could now volunteer to serve in the military.
     The substance of American citizenship--most vitally, freedom and justice--was torn away from us, but now we were not to be denied the "responsibility" of citizenship. Japanese Americans had the right to be killed for a country that had humiliated them, stripped them of property and dignity and placed them behind barbed wire, That was the sticking point of Question Number 27.

     Question Number 28 was as subtly insidious as Question Number 27 was blunt. The stealth of this question was in the single sentence asking respondents to "swear unqualified allegiance" to the United States and in the same breath " the Japanese emperor." If one answered yes, intending an affirmative to the first part, it was also "forswearing" a presumed existing loyalty to the Emperor of Japan. If one were to answer no to deny any such preexisting loyalty to "forswear," then the same no also rejected allegiance to the United States. It was perceived by many as a trap question. The two questions became an incendiary combination that exploded in turmoil in all ten internment camps, from Manzanar, California to Rohwer, Arkansas.
     When the dust finally settled, it is remarkable that so many internees answered "yes-yes" to the two questions. This paved the way for recruitment officers to sign up young men for military service. The large number of men who signed on is a tribute to their extraordinary determination to make true the ideals of the flag to which they had pledged allegiance daily in their classrooms, even in camp.
     For my parents, the struggle to answer the Loyalty Questionnaire was torturous. My father was raised and educated in America. He had chosen this country as his home. Until the war broke out, his plan for himself and his family had been to build our future here. But he had been born in Japan, and U.S. law denied naturalized citizenship to Asian immigrants, though their children born in the U.S. would be citizens. Question Number 27 asked if he would be willing to serve in combat for the United States, a country that not only rejected him for citizenship but incarcerated him because of his race. At forty years old, with a wife and three children all interned by that government, he was being asked to go on combat duty for such a country.
     Question Number 28, in essence, asked him to be a man without a country. My father felt no particular allegiance to the Emperor, but Japan was the country where he was born. It was the place where he still had relatives and memories. This question asked him to discard all that and swear allegiance to a country that would not have him. For my father, this was ultimately the point where he had to say enough‹no more! It was not no longer a question of any citizenship but of simple dignity. He answered "no-no."
     For my mother, Question Number 27 was almost laughable in its preposterousness were it not so anguishing. She answered no. The most tormenting question for her was Question Number 28. She was an American citizen, born in Florin, California. Her children were all Americans and knew only this country. But she was married to a man her country rejected for naturalization and now considered an enemy alien. Her native country uprooted her family and brought us all here to this crude one-room barrack in Arkansas. And now this inquisition, this insult piled on top of injury. Question Number 28 was asking her to choose between her country and her husband, her birthplace or her family, one or the other.
     It was this scene that I had witnessed in that brief waking moment in the dark of that kerosene-lit night. I saw the moment when Mama was making the decision to answer no-no on her Loyalty Questionnaire. It was an act that was going to have her categorized "disloyal" by the U.S. government and the beginning of Mama¹s eventual loss of her American citizenship.
     My final memory of Rohwer, like my first, eight months before, is framed by a train window. At the mess hall that morning I said my goodbyes to my friends. The ladies were sniffling as they bowed their final farewells to each other. Some of the teenage girls were embracing and crying out loud.
     At the train by the main gate, Daddy shook hands somberly with everybody lined up to see us off. Then we got on. From the window, all I could see was a sea of sad faces--faces of people who had become our friends. Mama said we will never see them again. The black barracks that had seemed so stark in their uniformity when we first arrived now had identities. They had become the homes of friends. The guard towers were no longer ominous sentinels but simply a part of the landscape. And even the barbed wire fence had become just a familiar playground enclosure. All this now we were leaving forever.
     The lurch of the train as it started to move was the tug that broke the emotional grip. The sorrow was uncontainable. Some ladies wept as if there were no bottom to their grief.


© 1999-2003 GoldSea
No part of the contents of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission.